Loading...
1101 N Congress Avenue MSPM-2024.10.69688 DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: 1101 North Congress Avenue (MSPM-2024.10.69688) APPLICANT: Daniel A. Gherghina, Siloam Holding Company LLC APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 281 Oregon Lane, Boca Raton, Florida 33487 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: April 15, 2025 APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approve request for Variance (ZNCV-2024.10.69688) from Part III, Chapter 4, Article V, Section 2.C. Table 4-18 — Commercial and Office & Health Care Uses, to allow a reduction of 42 required parking spaces to accommodate the 8,111 square foot additions to an existing two-story 15,800 square foot building. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 1101 North Congress Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO. THIS MATTER was presented to the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the approval sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the approval sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ✓ HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the approval requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "D" with notation "Included." 4. The Applic nt's request is hereby GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 above. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other: ,�gOYNTp���11 c-3i REAL INCORPORATED: i DATED: 11C � ' 4 s 192 • •• City lerk , ••% . S:\Planning SSHARED\WPiPROJECTS\Southern Homes of Palm Beach\Bay Walk IPU 310 N Federal Highw�MSPM 23-004 and MPMD 23� •: ��: �P I • '1 • • . s . •._ . w La / J • DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 25-004 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor Rebecca Shelton Members of the City Commission Thru: Amanda B. Radigan, AICP LEED AP Planning and Development Director From: John Stout Planner II Date: April 4, 2025 (April 15, 2025 City Commission Meeting) Project: Boynton Beach Promenade — 1101 North Congress Avenue Variance (ZNCV-2024.10.69688) Requests: Approval of the Variance request from Part III, Chapter 4, Article V, Section 2.C. Table 4-18 "Commercial and Office & Health Care Uses" to grant a reduction of 42 parking spaces rather than providing the required 436 parking spaces. BACKGROUND The applicant, Siloam Holding Company, LLC, through its agent iPlan & Design, LLC, is submitting a Variance to the Land Development Regulations (V to LDRs) to seek a reduction in the required shared parking for the existing outparcel (1101 North Congress Avenue) at Boynton Beach Promenade by 42 parking spaces. The subject property is generally situated in the northeast corner of the Boynton Beach Promenade shopping center on a 1.06-acre parcel (46,031 square feet). The subject property has a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use designation and a Community Commercial (C3) zoning district designation. PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting a reduction of 42 required parking spaces. The variance request is to support the proposed building modifications, which include the addition of 8,111 square feet. The addition includes converting the existing drive-thru into 1,000 square feet of office use at the first floor and adding a third floor of up to 7,111 square feet of medical office use. This variance is necessary to accommodate the building's expansion, as required by the original parking standards for the outparcel. Pursuant to City Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Part III, Chapter 4, Section 2.C. Table 8- 18 — Commercial and Office & Health Care Uses, the use of Shopping Center must be parked at a ratio of one(1)parking space for every two-hundred (200)square feet. The applicant has proven that this project cannot meet the parking requirement of the Code by using any code-based reductions, relief, or measures provided through existing processes. The applicant has demonstrated that it is not feasible to provide the required number of parking spaces through a shared parking study. However, due to the existing and proposed uses on-site, as well as real- life and day-to-day activities, the applicant has demonstrated that parking will not hinder the residents of Boynton Beach and will be sufficient for the site's intended use. Off-street parking regulations require one (1) parking space for every two hundred (200) square feet of Shopping Center use area. With the applicant's proposal for the additional 8,111 square feet, the total shopping center area would be 87,112 square feet, requiring a minimum of 436 parking spaces shared throughout the shopping center. The applicant is able to provide only 387 parking spaces on-site, as the project is already built out. Based on the proposed addition, the applicant is required to provide an additional 41 parking spaces with the additions. The applicant provided a parking study that determined the day-to-day parking use and expected parking demand with the proposed development. The study states that the expected parking demand is less than the required 436 parking spaces, and the proposed 387 parking spaces are adequate for the proposed development. In conjunction with this Major Site Plan Modification, the applicant applied for a Variance to obtain relief from the reduction of 42 parking spaces, providing 387 spaces rather than the required 436 spaces (ZNCV-2024.10.69688). However, because the shopping center shares parking, the entire shopping center would be under-parked by 49 parking spaces. Despite this variance, the shopping center remains under-parked by 7 parking spaces. ANALYSIS The City Commission has the authority and duty to authorize, upon appeal, a variance from the terms of the City ordinance that will not be contrary to the public interest when, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the City ordinance's provisions would result in unnecessary and undue hardship. In order to authorize the variance, the applicant must demonstrate that the request meets the following criteria (a-f). The applicant's justification and response to these criteria are attached (see Exhibit B - Justification Statement). a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. The applicant has stated that, typically, fee-simple outparcels, like the subject site, within larger shopping centers are parked at a separate rate than the overall shopping center. This outparcel contained medical and professional office uses, which typically have a less intense parking ratio requirement than standard retail uses. This site should not have been parked at the ratio of one (1) parking space to two-hundred (200) square feet, required by code for the use of the shopping center. The applicant did not create the parking discrepancy that exists today within the parking code created by Staff, and the proposed variance will not contribute to a real-world parking discrepancy if approved. Although the applicant has provided evidence that day-to-day activities on-site do not currently require the number of parking spaces at the intensity required by code, this site is currently adequately parked in accordance with the code and has no special conditions or circumstances different from those of any other site within the City that is parked at the same rate. The proposal for additional square footage within a project that is currently at its capacity creates a hardship for the applicant by proposing more square footage and not utilizing the existing vacant space on site. b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The applicant has stated that the over-burdened parking rate assigned to the outparcel, which was originally approved, has prohibited upgrades and expansions of the subject site. The misaligned parking rate for the outparcel itself is not the result of the applicant's actions. It is true that the applicant did not assign the parking rate for the subject property. However, the subject site is currently adequately parked and parked at a ratio consistent throughout the city and consistent with many municipalities. The applicant wishes to add additional square footage to a previously developed site that is currently parked at its capacity, which has caused the requirement for additional parking onsite as a result of the action of the applicant. c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. The applicant has stated that granting the variance will correct the misaligned parking rate assigned to the fee-simple outparcel to a more consistent rate of parking for both the Medical Office and Professional Office uses that currently exist and will be expanded upon in the future. All development is required to provide additional parking to accommodate the increased building square footage resulting from any new use. Because the outparcel is owned separately from the shopping center and the parking is shared among the entire shopping center, including the outparcel, the applicant is unable to make modifications to the entire site, which would be required to provide parking that meets the applicant's needs. d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. A literal interpretation of the code would require the applicant to provide parking at a rate that is not feasible without altering property not owned by the applicant. Without these alterations, the applicant would not be able to provide the required parking, and the additional square footage for the building would not be permitted. e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. The requested reduction of 42 parking spaces is the minimum number necessary to accommodate the outparcel itself and the additional square footage of the building. f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff believes that granting this variance would have no impact upon surrounding properties, considering the true day-to-day activities on site and the actual parking requirements of the businesses utilizing the buildings and sharing the parking today. However, if other uses within the existing shopping center were to become more intense, their parking entitlements would have been reduced as a result of this variance. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis contained herein, staff recommends disapproval of this variance request to reduce the number of required parking spaces by 42, based on the following justification: 1. The variance request is a result of a self-imposed hardship, as the proposed addition exceeds the site's capacity to accommodate the additional square footage; and 2. The applicant has not sufficiently justified the variance criteria, which prevents staff from supporting the variance. While the project is potentially beneficial to the community and a strong example of infill development, these factors do not meet the necessary requirements for the variance; and 3. The request involves reducing the existing entitlements for the surrounding shipping center, which would decrease the allocated parking for the other buildings and businesses, even though parking is not currently being fully utilized; and 4. The variance request pertains to shared parking for the shopping center. If granted, the shopping center would remain under-parked by seven parking spaces. Staff has reviewed this request for a Zoning Code Variance and recommends DISAPPROVAL based on the analysis contained herein. However, should the City Commission approve the proposed Variance request, staff recommends adjusting the reduction of required parking space to 49. Conditions of Approval for the proposed variance can be referenced in Exhibit "D". Any additional conditions recommended or required by the City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Beach Promenade\1101 N Congress(Outparcel)\MSPM,ZNCV- 20024.10.69688\CC\Exhibit B-Staff Report-Variance, 1101 N Congress.docx Ex. A: Location Map `^^'CITY OF.------ BOYNTON • Congres . (MSPM,ZCVL-2024.10.69688) - - BEACH f 1;ae . /:' ilr' , ,.,7; , I i , . , ipi; 7 (I.', . 4.' ' .71.: 004 ', . j L • 1I j.i _ • jai' ,. , ` x. sg s• ;irr,� .• 1.41-.1.0 e. ', L 1 r �r v 1111 : S--ITE y 1- (� 'e+1 `. :*: ,tib• .• +�• rae."� + d I / iltal ' PO 8 4. . . cd� r , 2 ,4. t:4. c't I �1II'II" -•#-� a�� N c r' �_I •-: ^..t •—'' ' ' �7 ��l • , :-. .,,,,,.I At-• .. , : . r-.L.-"-i, ,-ir i.., ,i, 4%. . 1 ;.; - r. ../ ;, ; -:,-- ,A,:, • -p,,,i, .i, .t., 0! i . .. i, •, / I . : •' ' is.,,..,' .....4 ,:r14_ , •* '. l ti- �i illi -t r ,:a'}"". ;.I ' ', 1 ;1 . ..L. ..,„:„:;,7' -. ,)- ' .. ... . ., ,,, . . • , . .'44 I g Is • j .:_ 4 �'° ' . C .-4?"' < ..- • p-- ' 1. I A •• III Ss '.•t' �, It - • •: • i. .44.fliblr ME � Feet ? -� - HLA \ �ESIG\ Boynton Beach Promenade Variance & April 04 , 2025 Boynton Beach Promenade (1101 N. Congress Ave.) Variance to LDRs Request Project Narrative 04-04-2025 I. INTRODUCTION: On behalf of the Applicant (SILOAM HOLDING COMPANY, LLC), iPlan & Design, LLC is pleased to submit a Variance to the Land Development Regulations application (V to LDRs) to seek a reduction in the required parking for an existing outparcel at Boynton Beach Promenade. The variance is being sought to allow for the proposed first and third floor expansion of up to 8,111 SF to the existing building. The subject property is a+/-1.06 acre/ (46,031 SF) outparcel.The property is addressed as 1101 N. Congress Avenue, within the City of Boynton Beach, Florida and its Property Control Number is 08-43-45-19-05-015-0043. The parcel has a Local Retail Commercial(LRC)Land Use Designation and a Community Commercial(C3)Zoning District Designation. The subject property is a fee simple outparcel located in the northeast corner of the Boynton Town Center Shopping Center. II. REQUEST(S): 1. Reduction of up to forty-two(42) required parking spaces for the Outparcel uses based on the original parking rates established for the parcel (The main shopping center is deficient up to 49 parking spaces from the approved required parking total of 436 parking spaces): The above request is in support of the following proposed building and site modifications: • A proposed addition of up to 8,111 SF of Medical and Professional Office use on the first and third floors of the existing Office use,which include the following specific modifications, • The Conversion of the drive-thru into 1,000 SF of Office use on the First Floor (included in 8,111 SF additional SF) • The addition of a third floor of up to 7,111 SF of Medical Office use(included in 8,111 SF additional SF) • The reconfiguration the parking areas adding up to 10 new parking spaces on the outparcel and provision of safer vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation around the building • The relocation and redevelopment of a new dumpster enclosure to the NW corner of the site III. BACKGROUND: Per the 1993 approved site plan, this parcel was approved for Bank/Office uses only. Per The City's Code Ordinance Article 4. Sec. 3. D Use Matrix Table, both Medical and Professional Office uses are allowed by right under the Community Commercial (C3) Zoning Designation. Per the Shopping Center Covenant Section 4. (d), (attached herein with this application submittal) any parking within the center shall be calculated at 5 parking spaces (PS) for each 1,000 SF of gross building areas (GFA), which equates at 1 PS for every 200 SF of building GFA. This "shopping center" parking standard has been consistently adopted by Zoning Staff and is the base line calculation utilized for the overall site plan in conjunction with an updated 2024 Parking Analysis provided herein. It continues to add that in the event, this number is reduced, and it is consented by the control parcel and approved by the 1 IiPD No . 21 - 01 - 003 PLA \ o mi ^(G\ Boynton Beach Promenade — Variance April 04 , 2025 government authorities, the minimum total number of parking spaces within the center should be no less than 380 PS. It is important to mention that the Covenant Exhibit D contains the 1993 approved site plan prior to the small modifications for the Olive Garden Restaurant, However, the plan preparation date or requested building intensity (in Sq. Ft.) are not legible on the plans and the covenant doesn't mention the total approved building GFA. Therefore, a SF analysis was performed (see table below) between the 1993 approved site plan, the 2005 certified survey provided by Caulfield and Wheeler, and the calculations provide by iPlan & Design (based on PAPA) to identify the difference. The below table shows that the difference in SF between these documents is less than 700 SF compared to the 1993 approved site plan, which equates to approximately two (2) parking spaces. Square Footage Analysis from 1993 to 2005 #Of Building Location 1993 Approved SP 2005 CW Certified Difference in SF SP+PAPA Building 1 NW (1-story) 22,652 SF 22,953 SF +301 SF NE (2-story) 33,531 SF Building 2 (26,420 SF 1st Floor 33,073 SF -458 SF 7,111 SF 2nd Floor) Building 4 SW(1 story) 8,018 SF 7,856 SF -162 SF Olive Gardens SE (2 story) 14,800 SF Building 5 Bank (5,000 SF 1st Floor 15,785 SF +985 SF 9,800 SF 2nd Floor) TOTAL 79,001 SF 79,667 SF* +666 SF *Total building SF used for the herein calculations Based on the 79,667 SF of existing building plus the proposed 8,111 SF of building expansion,the new total building GFA is 87,112 SF. IV. PARKING ANALYSIS: Based on the above, it is assumed that the parking calculations outlined within the Covenant were based on the 1993 approved site plan as the parking data calculations are consistent.The 1993 approved site plan reflects a total building GFA of 79,001 SF with a total required parking of 395 (79,001 SF/200 SF = 395 PS), which is 1 PS for every 200 SF maximum. Also, it appears that the minimum of 380 PS as required by the Covenant was based on 1 PS for every 208 SF (79,001 SF/208 SF = 380 PS). Per communication with the P&Z Director Amanda Radigan, the required parking for the new expansion must be reviewed as inclusive parking for the shopping center and not as a separate/stand-alone outparcel parking only. A second parking study was conducted in June 2024 to re-confirm the number of available parking spaces within the shopping center and to provide up-to-date parking observations similar to what was conducted and observed in 2021, (note the 2021 parking study has also been provided herein to show consistency in the available parking numbers over recent years). 21iPD No . 21 - 01 -003 PLAN & DFSG\ Boynton Beach Promenade — Variance April 04 , 2025 Based on the historical approval information, a Parking Occupancy Study was conducted by Kimley-Horn for the entire shopping center to determine the actual parking demand and expected parking demand including the proposed amendment to the outparcel and intensification of the Medical & Professional Office uses on that site. The approved parking rate for the overall site is 1 space per 200 square feet. When the 8,111 square feet of office are added to the site, the functional parking rate will become 1 space per 235 square feet(new overall square footage parked using the existing approved parking supply). Since the observed parking rate is less than the code-required parking rate,the site will provide adequate parking for this proposed development. However, as mentioned above,the 1993 approved site plan and POA Covenant parking rate is 1 PS per 200 SF. If the additional 8,111 SF expansion is calculated as approved, the new functional parking rate (based on the 368 PS that currently exist on-site)for the shopping center is 1 PS per 219 SF versus 1 PS per 378 SF based on the existing parking demand, which is the most realistic condition today and most likely in the future with the similar composition of uses within this shopping center. V. VARIANCE CRITERIA CH 2,ART II,SECTION 4.D.3(a-f): 3. Review Criteria. In order for the City Commission to grant a variance, the applicant must demonstrate that: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land,structure or building involved, and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. RESPONSE: Typically, fee-simple outparcels within larger shopping centers are parked at a separate rate than the overall shopping center consistent with the specific users)approved within the outparcel. This outparcel was carved out of the original/overall shopping center as a stand alone use that was approved in 1993 with a mix of Bank and Professional Office uses. Medical- and Professional Office and Bank Uses typically park at different rates than standard Retail uses, and from standard Shopping Center parking rates which is how the Boynton Promenade was originally parked, (at a rate of 1 parking space per 200 sf of "Shopping Center" use, or "In-line Retail" use). This Applicant did not create the parking discrepancy that exists today by way of application of the parking code by Staff; nor will they contribute to a real-world parking discrepancy or problem if allowed to expand the Medical and Professional Office use due to the availability of parking as observed on the ground over the pasts 4- years (real-world parking conditions analyzed between two parking studies). b. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant for the variance. RESPONSE: The over-burdened parking rate assigned to the outparcel Medical and Professional Office uses is a result of how the Shopping Center was originally approved and represents a special circumstance that prohibits the upgrading and expansion of the existing Medical and Professional Office uses that operate within the outparcel today. It is common for outparcels to be parked separately from the "in-line" retail and food-retail uses located within the principal building of a Shopping Center development. The separate parcel is both physically separated and typically a different intensity than the in-line bays that make up the main center. The mis-aligned parking rate for the outparcel is not the result of the actions of the Applicant. c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this section to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. 31iPD No . 21 - 01 - 003 P A \ Boynton Beach Promenade – Variance 8, _—SO\ April 04 , 2025 RESPONSE: Granting the variance will correct the mis-aligned parking rate assigned to the fee-simple outparcel to a more consistent rate of parking for both the Medical Office and Professional Office uses that exist today and that will be expanded upon in the future.The City's land development regulations currently utilize a parking rate of 1 PS/200 SF of Medical Office use and 1PS/300 SF of Professional Office use for stand-alone uses as provided in LDR Chapter 4, Article V. Section 2.C. Table 4-18 when analyzing the parking needs of these two uses. The supply of available parking within the overall shopping center and on the outparcel proper is in excess of +/-200 parking spaces at almost any time of the day and any day of the week. Correcting this parking rate inconsistency is limited to this center and the center's specific entitlement history. d. That literal interpretations of the provisions of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. RESPONSE: Literal interpretation of the code will inhibit the updating and enhancement of the existing outparcel due to the parking rates being excessive for the Office (Medical and Professional) uses proposed for the outparcel site. Application of the appropriate parking rates for these specific uses will better align with the regulations codified within Chapter 4,Article V.Section 2.C.Table 4-18 of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs). e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible reasonable use of the land, structure or building. RESPONSE: The requested reduction in the number of required parking spaces is the minimum deviation that will allow for the updating/expansion/enhancement of a thirty-nine-year-old building (constructed in 1985) along the largest commercial corridor within the City of Boynton Beach. Redevelopment on this outparcel property will be more consistent with all of the new and updated residential and non-residential developments that have been recently approved and constructed along and across N.Congress Avenue. Granting the variance shall retain Medical and Professional Office uses and users within the City, with no burden or off-site impacts to the general public. f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or be otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. RESPONSE: The requested reduction in the number of required parking spaces is the minimum deviation that will allow for the updating/expansion/enhancement of a thirty-nine-year-old building along the largest commercial corridor within the City of Boynton Beach. Redevelopment here will be more consistent with all of the new and updated residential and non-residential developments that have recently occurred along and across N. Congress Avenue. Granting the variance shall retain Medical and Professional Office uses and users within the City, with no burden or off-site impacts to the general public. VI. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR OUTPARCEL(MEDICAL&PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES): The existing building is a two-story building located in the northeast corner of the Boynton Beach Promenade Shopping Center(within a fee-simple outparcel). The site currently supports up to sixty-three (63) parking spaces. All proposed expansions to the existing building will occur within the existing footprint. 41iPD No . 21 -01 - 003 IP A \ D1S3\ Boynton Beach Promenade — Variance April 04, 2025 Up to 1,000 SF of Office use will be added to the west side of the building and will remove the existing under-building drive-through lanes. Up to ten(10) new parking spaces will be programmed on site adjacent to the building as part of increasing the overall building-square-footage. The remaining 7,111 SF will be constructed as a third-floor expansion. The overall height will remain compliant with the maximum building height permitted (up to 45 FT). Site modifications include the relocation of an outdated dumpster enclosure and restriping of parking spaces in the southernmost row of parking within the site. The expected mix of Medical Office and Professional Office uses will be 13,111 SF and 9,800 SF respectively for a total building area of 22,911 SF. The tables below indicate the current parking rate for the outparcel at the historic "Shopping Center Rate" and at a more realistic"Specific Uses/Intensities Parking Rate". It should be noted that the Shopping Center has up to 200 parking unused parking spaces at any given time or day of the week. Proposed Parking Calculation(to Uses Code)and Schematic of Use(s): 1101 N. Congress Ave. Mixed Use(Medical Office/Prof. Office) Parking Uses SF Floor Ratio PS Req. Comment Medical Office 13111 lst/3rd 1/200 66 Split btwn. 3rd& 1st Floors Professional Office 9800 2nd 1/300 49 2nd Floor only Bank 0 1st 1/250 0 No Bank use proposed 22911 Total Req'd Parking 115 Note:60 PS exist on site(inc.4 HC PS) BUILDING/USE PROFILE 7111 SF THIRD FL. 9800 SF SECOND FL. 6000 SF FIRST FL. Note:Substantial 3rd FL addition with additional area for mechanical equip./No Bank use/Partially expanded 1st FL Proposed Parking Calculation(to Uses&Intensities Proposed for Outparcel)and Schematic of Use(s): 1101 N. Congress Ave. Mixed Use(Medical Office/Prof. Office) Parking Uses SF Floor Ratio PS Req. Comment Medical Office 13111 lst/3rd 1/200 66 Split btwn. 3rd&1st Floors Professional Office 9800 2nd 1/300 33 2nd Floor only Bank 0 1st 1/250 0 No Bank use proposed 22911 Total Req'd Parking 99 Note:60 PS exist on site(inc.4 HC PS) BUILDING/USE PROFILE 7111 SF THIRD FL. 9800 SF SECOND FL. 6000 SF FIRST FL. Note:Substantial 3rd FL addition with additional area for mechanical equip./No Bank use/Partially expanded 1st FL 51iPD No . 21 - 01 - 003 • II • TAKE (EXISTING) ^'J� PI . -�� • • :S 4.4.4.4._ - �/-.'�\_..--•./-•✓ '✓-:/`/..., r i �` 9 . .-r!' .b wa......0.+1:... • 'I I S.MFoRMwaRMunl' wzu J1 5 I �•. i s_ w+ow.re 1o.DOW.51E. f i. z ��'° •.'�10"""'1 .. 77 ..'....... `\ _ \•\ "-(�_, I 'T_. /i(� M wr ; ( OF[,w+. \t 1 -'ff-- 1 0'11'4. �, gg J i •....... 4I C 6 I h OMI n n J,- _ +f�. , ::::::::' O --- -- --, pUtAPSTfR ENCLOSURE PLAN s ///''^••��� r 404..1 ' „it it .0,0„.y ....,.. ... //7/7 �,�• T :::• +/-F ' L , bi Iijji d I �a. IN • �.wr rs- �"-a- f • ••,..•••,1 �Iliple i l „ z.,,..1.13,.: : -: Lrh Gr. Q -Ihw » JD' fTl - J -. :::::::::i fit— --•� _Fair �..e�, .-s.. — ,� 'bigh " rAra<woas►�r • :um: a1.um.wa tri• '~ % •�•Ul•,• ♦�`'• �wwz :i i ;•;••••:.i ��,_ .1..,.........%_„....e N. .�• — � 1Wall • • ,,.�MU 1.14.»1. iist ......••• i�EJ : 1! il'�Dim — 4.1:4.4.: .., r ' E _• .. o .1110 Sii:: I. ili3i.._.. (..:.: �c = III NM 1 ._, t Mc ... ...`�•„-- =• :::a N _ �,eusT c — _ c • n n .... ,� r _ c E1 : 1 9......o,..... 4.111 ••••••••••• J 'ff i 1111. 11■ -- c I ...Me. :aEiE _; : ° 4 0 •nIMI = .1 11 — E -- — 1. :d •i Irtnfto ”" �R 41 :s ' - IMI OUVa DMO[ a ,,. --" 1111 'I N -_ __ _ J a • w.o_ ... 2 NJ "EP ■ • C:. -� © O O © —Tr — + ' I l �t' "I—I— c ""°® "4;: iaas: ■ Y ..••.••, & DESIGN -- ..17.1,.w. __ _.1100'_ ::3::. CURRENT SITE ik — — — Y` »w1=0•10 a ,w. .. .°..w,. s ::::: CONDITION OUT — �""°"� 'ou VARIANCE TABLE NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE 4. b,10.11.1.110.a Ma #. "••' PARCEL UPDATE �) �;K�� 1 •• •' VARIANCE REQUESTED-ART V.SEC 2(C)•TABLE 4.18 COMMERCIAL PARKING t. 1 ::i::::- •• 03-18-2025 sus • S:: REQUIRED PROPOSED ma, °• w•^ •� :::::: PARKING PARKING VARIANCE REQUEST .Sn.10 uruscw(.w1 I .ENl1.»O.w1p D '"`"ALAN"""m'p'°""°»"'»" �csYt. :i••••• ::ar.::: ®u wo n/s1/+s ace 1 "WU. 11SPS 73 PS 42 PS ,z.•Mb°A4.A4. ®w.. °/.,A4 -'4111k 2 Cir ALAN STRASSLE . ®tlw1.p a/f0/1� 7Y ARC(-11TaCTC,IN O./�� /121 0.149 z/'N•S ®.Fw.xo s/z.p° ,I • • (iC//a m.Nwq VW,* ®11.00•w0 4ftli.. III IF Islet VrN (:::11:: : Su:i:l25 NOV 97/4l'.,'131? O F F I C E • M A X Ilii i:iii:U•,30'-0- I ii"i II33SIIIIIIIiIII'=?III I'' BOO TON BEACH F LO RIDA e'T.'21 - .. -. . r,111*..:i4: SITE DATA PROJECT TEAM LOCATION MAP HIN .. DESIGN N .AGAR DATA 04044: NNW. Mw. LarvIscace.4.UI. Ir.N.Fnwrwn SUMP' 910M111010000060W A11C TIM M.= Ow a 1.01 I IC mein Ir..At... ener orna A.A.Inc CANNA Wheel,Ire 923N 0.041404, 376%°114.1• 110311140431N.9.Inn 89x04 Awn.. »40340 AANUn Dowd Wel.k<199477S.oxnw7A.9.TI I2IS 1900 C94*,Net51.1•Im �'Vrn 1 nem C.o..Mesa 54/7833401 NOF.NAME 404040.7 OW.SAN. No RAN R 31417.001 .olr...NA 581505 WenPA,N•N..7111401 Pr.OM1.F134990 ....w 144.113301 901 AMAu 3841. %I TN 4217 101 N.Caw.Awnx•9081'45. WA R1.WINO WM TA%1791.]17 IM-..561 719 5 86 IN-.5616150665 54:863341%1 a 115.45$ ,NFNIP..1�r.14, N OW WI AmMu 9MR l:Notle.0614breswn SiSal4n/N.04.1Pmn Icor.31ern6nw,00oan 101.8.A6.n4a.660.r rn.0m 11,.664•rl.4a.+ 1j 1011x0844 Off a tnsnsc USE 14411119 ORE , IY� . 49A0115NM21 u arNxa $ w' »....A.. r.orouO A( NOKA 4.16.118 M IPTG CONTR.WWI. 34-4145_15030139943 C s_ ° ••_ i 1 •. Sm MU fA , .5.111.10 .r a•" .w 2 . ••• . 201.4 o.C0..9U1.rrcoAww.o° L AI. aro I FURA IMO U9 01C IOCAl 10T44 C0AM0104 _ _ � ,wt ''w _ 4131.0.DATA(MST.usol - 27. /,1 NW AAND...4,044 OW. U. v -- • • F.1 • I�.. -Tu 9UAORC ANA lixn*2 14.100 9 1.1 t 0 I I I I 11 l O O ,I I 16 Ill a ° +. ! _ I Q 0 1 I n•-1 r.. I.L I /-/ .611--�--1 I- w LL ,..- WAWA DATA lMa0SF0lm9 "W ••I •R� ! I / 0 NOF(EgllA NMI.Al 9.100 9 I � .4.mem OIC.PM ON&era RN Mill SF / - 1 rr _ / TOM RA104C AMA New.41 23911 Si 1 ^_ I Fel ` 1 1 di C� ' I 434 II NOIIAs81NIw rOOnm.F6VIA140MS Moo 404001 •��`; r I. =4nl-� ` , 7� I I 11 LU til ...-- - ... lilli g,I 1UJ U aN9ry WA WA _ I. © Q f. ' T4C3 I 0I- Q n nORR.M..,N.ACM/ WA M: 1.05 81 _J Y1� -• • �} m I TOT AMA IAN 91 6.010 W../.SO .w. 1 U) LU 1 1 .101140x14014 ANT a rt 1n rt 1 `' I THREE-STORY BUILDING 1 r ?;(g��^ Z L1.I Imu.01,MN, W.rt 83 rt 1 b Y1,91,SF ��`\""_ .AA,.. I' mOMANI IAN) 0 x TM 1.EDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE I� 1.49` •¢ (O� J CO D II FIN FL•1493 �� &_!c "n < Z 104.1.44 MnOII.a.IMAII) 00 050 � O. S 1 S7a 01091 W 10N7,141x7 45 rt W R 1..51.=11 1 %111 ,- I 1_ • • z z O 141.00 CONWIA1A1 uses NOW= F4wn0 C I 1 ; O I I __ 1_. M INA w Pen Awe.-95.641.7... .. o •-•. V •`_s• I © 1 I O Z 914100074 MR IMAM 115 n -' ' 41 - i 1- 4µNN1AM11010 4.14{4x101 42 W O U .J: a w I r I ( p}, 8 C I �_ N 110 SPA.MWR01917U40IN TOTAL PSCaWtJ 5 5 0 .' 3 1 •-a I I ml 4 .�, ,. 1 } I I 18 51 /off TO74014101X0 11T 131 • ._ I 1 1 l-r I I °tl I �g1 W �1` Nr' x1.17 r 4 914.,1,:400 i©. ! 1 EI r i y I LOADer09u1.1alu0li]y1s1 r..1 wee Y/W w► ..... I1 15 p 19 p 15 11 66 �j FLS TS SAO.ST IFNI AIN.IFTI �•. ,1 1' 11 11 ,1 II II 0 �� I ..I 6 I1 14471rt1V.a 14811.1 0 R %.5 II II ILII II II II _ Mut SRN..•WEST MN M F7 395 5'1'101.111 ° 11.4400 x761.sal.6611 o F7 %5 '" _�--- I�� ��W�� u= xW�x�� .� Ir 971.4 P.M 11310 T R 14 n . rM�• _ ASO USE CAIOAATION AA.A 9 4011 SOF t1, Iditilifilllo �• 11 11 1r ll t 11 1 1 ✓ - - R001FOL0TOwMA08 'MI-I SAD /=LL�FW%NMIw06AMA 459. O0 CTS ..! ' tib 110.44413NISL ]"n °a 3 STANDARD AND HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL DUMPSTER DETAILow%__ MI WIP1M104.5 MAAS ON 00 - w ,ONO..WIMPS wnF0 W. WA WA I �0rlrs !- •Il MM Iu I NAME 1011t4ND5CA1 ARIAS W. WA WA w. 0. •.11.RMaAM01 TOTAL 011X095/CNN SPAR .7n 014 MO wwl1'ar^W ...-.11- r• * �MMOOOf.Mfl]FVCxO Wrenn A //MMNO®Ioa F4AA4.0 %y2�N. .441.1 NO. 1]01%Ol%4 A S �� "H •. I ("0.1.0.0.1411.0.1 14.1MA * /049 C0T] 10,,1} I." « 'C/ !T T�N M ANA o 441x301 •4/......-.34301.111.000 1O1-+w� /'2YIIl1YCE WmtM(°Mxr Wi •.... 7705 .....14014�e' / Mf 1.47.... w'gsaA NMRvwIf TOi Nm°/9m Nn.�T �141C. 0r.C10F01M0..' °Mv0.11.0 00MMYLERIIwm 9aW 1••p NOUS - r / •4STR*a1 ., 6111InMAI x014 1tl.mAl.t1. 1441.1 S.M144.1 Araont987 M 1.44.14pYF.01Y00.0..�I a °0011100001 V T E ~Mt Aw91tl1040R10 no6..M1 a.rN1Nlw.wsW nw w6.Weaa . /\/(\,A(1}�y1 .1114x.....7...............1:rFwasoc.1100on I.n..r.,.N. VM.QI[W31®•M1lY.M3q TA01A11mMBa/1MO10 v NNor 490 MIN C � AA.WENN i - ., . ' t�� •I;i , -91111 O.IR Y810.MD.1I0F0- Iry--I, «-., nIgmet 2 ,° ` ,.. FSP 1>1 MR MOWN AM NAN 1.44114tl.NT IV= 3 40M001.OM010o.MY -------1 e----- e--- ) 13 ___..F.] k._.....„ 1 _ E !I - -1 , c m �g ❑® • D oN çfr = m _ 1 • RAr+�1 r U -z7, :1 �e i,, jg 3 al9 Pli • IIIIIIII I o o of If ,ihi _ in ;0111iiiikh.- - _ -/ N 11 Ear----Iia •i - 1 I-1 I oi [,., „,,i j , 1 LP 0 - • ® . _ Di 1 4 11 A 1 _ I I �.r� \.. N . d iP r MP r Ii L- 11111 I • _J" ti_ + c - : I I ° ' u II1211.. 4, , ,. a . ___....) E: \ r � .�, I . � Trail L. ....... 7-- /,.............. 117=t,LE_, , ,... —; A 7 �� L / I ' 1. 11111 # 'TENANT IMPROVEMENT DRAWINGS for. 1 s f FAMILY MEDICAL OFFICE SUITE 100 == 7. i o ' 1 i 1101 N.CONGRESS AVE. 2 BOYNTON BEACH,FL.33426 "AMM N, n a ANE:7111E isuli[111 @ rl rl r 0 s d 4. 111. cn ilK m 0 m -J e,. m r •I � J 1 1:: rl ii , $ I�I -. I il FM, 4.J ❑ ❑ �❑ ❑ ElT _Dl --1 r---• .. 1=-_-_, 1 ZS - .7 PO Y t d TENANT IMPROVEMENT DRAWINGS for. FAMILY MEDICAL OFFICE SUITE 100 °"..a.0 s i i _ 1101 N.CONGRESS AVE. WOW RIME nm�aos�cnuc 0 BOYNTON BEACH,FL.33426 illil Oil rfri-T 11 1 W A mu I I . , , , \\ , , i l l l I I ' '1 1....141:_i. 1 1 01 1 1 _ - I11111111 11 1111111 4111111 __ III mill 1111 , IIIIIIIIII 1 I -I —� 0 I II V I I I r I Trill I I I I i i I � I i L I i I I I I I I I I__:1 II I II II I I II II T II (_ H II I. I I I II _ \ _u I I 1_ _ I I II l II I II I �- .I 11 II II I 1 1 11 I- II II , aI 11 II II I Il I ` I I I i -1 I, I II - U _-i 11 II 1 IIII I_ II MI I .._II -- N i U I ---MI—_�=•`,_. .- I I I I II - I®. I it 111 I ', I 11 1 III 4_ t I - ,II , II: 4 u p lir t " ITENANT IMPROVEMENT DRAWINGS for. Z 4 ,. FAMILY MEDICAL OFFICE SUITE 100 a ft1 i 1101 N.CONGRESS AVE. ......e. BOYNTON BEACH,FL. IITTTARROMIS LE Cal –11111111 i I. III, Liglik lillk—-- —--—--— +Ie..,"vs.,. / I 'f-, 11.11.11..111M —11111111M1M111111111.1 Ea 3d - iMI �1� • 'Ii I ± . Ii.,,,.. inon n n ■■■ IILM-Nfall1111&1111VMV-. _mut;up 3� - 1 �� 1101 4011* ----------— . -- --- r m� mmo F. i ,11 - =I - i imm.... -on ,,elw --! __.______ .. Iswim � - M I I I ' • 1 .t 'Rpm ° /V ii V 111 :VIE INFINP1116,,, .. O NORTH ELEVATION(PROPOSED) kelt-QIMPLF; RIM.b.COLOR MIMING. MATERIAL SCHEDULE 1r.t MK McOvrf FMK ro...r nisic al./s Arz 0 AW v.wotw wry V. : MIMI w SUM z ^ .111 OWfSmml)bl' w�7nwa� CO W / ` 1 1 v wiv. W Q LL R�dt11M91W0 r.Mon LL y= a �iN UIfKEo P4 LLQ 1Wr ' 1 > 1 . .- w e � ao.....�- _ 7 e =... a T r U O= M,-Y O NORTH ELEVATION(EXISTING) 0•o m w� a 0 1.1 .. l..1 A +7..=uk% I LSa. LS &WE u— __ i cc R.90 .. �A.r-�,If-�-,... ••,�.-....� rv ���_ ULS. us rum.: DICAL F �•«_� /�\ U 6� w� uac 1101 �u '�1■■1■ Gl III lIt, CI ir:_,<Ir ,—, .11 = -W- ;MIL .I .. kw ons...... II=1 7 ,' I I i A 1 ,,, ... , CO 7.---.-- r- A "1 1-71 . ' ' 0 EAST ELEVATION(EXISTING) 0 EAST ELEVATION(PROPOSED) ,rasa s._..-. A3.01 Y . . MINIM :114Min. . .I • 1 i r.i . • . . 11 E I 2 " Vill :::: =imp 1 1111 NO MI ON III III ...I.r . . ..•., . .„.. mil . .1...ff-M1-114!'iff.1 - ',1, ,ISEGM .0M1 .. ri. 7-, " TME . Li 1•1111 - --, { 1 I • ' 1=Les....., .. " _our- Mit-..7.11 LA 11011 1 .IL11,......r. . • in. ii• ...... _ • It'''s .--'' LIVII1111111 11111111111A ,L1 ialA, L 1* "6— INIm -.11...ww, TIM FIRAIU=Mr11---- NM 111 +""*".—--—--—-— ... ., .3-Aminim i IIII "Imimmim rial Ell N ci-ii n. - RaA' - PURIM 1 Wit I II,Ft A ih- Ill r r-=‘,1 II ;ii.-,.;1 i l'id II 1111 0"11M.' .---- ,.-.... , .. ,.:.,..-,.....-•, -. — mr- . ... • __.___._ ..__ _ ... - VOWOLL \-_./--- (---,SOUTH ELEVATION(PROPOSED) ....,OC.0.0.•4401•41 YIN 0,OS 011COACKAMOKA 010.1WIDAILIONIOIO. MATERIAL SCHEDULE ; OZ= ••••Z.=='"' t moo U. WY 0 ' Z EI i n r , OtolliNal LAO AK.A.On / .4041,10.1 MOM./ NIM,LoOK VOW 5 . HIIIII '111111. 1 OVIIII-OW OW MT CO ILI t 1 1 I ,..m.--i . ! NM - -- ' ' t • . • I our moo , inod. /WAI.IIIIW.••104 A.M. CIMMOIAMMM ,.. LU C..)< - E 2 ._ _ 6j ,ir. _........_., m_ in. 1 _ . ,. • -... 0..AOCATED 0.04.4) ONI.PO000 0 LU _I 0 co W r ,_i 11111-- El11111 i • .,....,.,.. ClIZSZL. o o 0, --.— Lu z rm SOUTH ELEVATION(EXISTING) \...._1 Ur•.0. 0..M, LU.- CO 0 O. 0 - O. LI MOMMOLMmom•mmatn---.... . LO 04.4611 .3 — ..... . ....! ....... . ILII ono MI . ......... .,,..,.. _ H ,. .... .. •.......,. I =or m,,„, )! ' . ' . "qiii , . , 1 JO MO IIIIIII IMO MIT . 4. . p.,_,,, +'—"a' 7 ll 1 - - ii.' : . . = .>_2=j PM , as : il! VI A 1111. 1111111LIM i " . . I i''i s'• gal 11 2016'4 -;•n_, .. AM . ri • .'I On= O ,.. An. Q \WEST ELEVATION(EXISTING) \._.../ Ire TO rTh WEST ELEVATION(PROPOSED) \,..) IN(•1,0. .... A3.02 • .. — 1 . I EXHIBIT "D" Conditions of Approval Project Name: 1101 North Congress Ave. File number: MSPM,ZNCV 2024.10.69688 Reference: April 15, 2025, Commission Meeting. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS / FORESTRY / UTILITIES Comments: 1. Dumpster enclosure shall be constructed in accordance with Engineering Standard Detail G-3 of the Engineering Design X Handbook and Construction Standards. Dumpster Detail on sheet FSP 1 of 1 shall be revised accordingly. 2. Parking lot must be maintained and drained so as to prevent nuisance conditions or a danger to the public and/or adjacent X property owners. 3. Standard parking stall dimensions shall be a minimum of 9.5' x 16.5' with 2' overhang. Parking Detail on sheet FSP 1 of 1 X shall be revised accordingly. 4. Parking stall striping and wheel stops shall conform with Engineering Standard Detail K-3 and K-4 of the Engineering X Design Handbook and Construction Standards. 5. All traffic signing and pavement marking shall comply with the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway X Administration Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 6. Sidewalks and curb ramps shall meet American with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility code requirements where X applicable. 7. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall: a) Submit a copy of TPS letter from Palm Beach County. b) Submit site engineering plans to include demolition, erosion control, paving, grading, drainage, water & sewer improvements. c) A note shall be provided on plans estimating the ERUs for X stormwater billing. Note: 1 ERU is equivalent to 1,937 square feet of impervious area. d) Submit drainage report/calculations signed and sealed by a professional engineer that demonstrates that the drainage system has been evaluated and that the proposed 1101 North Congress Ave (MSPM,ZNCV 2024.10.69688) Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT improvements have been accounted for. Ensure that the drainage calculations have pre/post conditions. Explain if there are any modifications proposed to the drainage system due to loss of onsite storage with the expansion of the building. e) Submit Digitally signed Engineer's cost estimate associated with the civil engineering plans (any cost for water & sewer shall be separate and subject to utility fees). f) Remit engineering fees in the amount of 2.3% of Engineer's cost estimate. 8. Prior to commencement of construction: a) Submit copies of outside agency permits; including but not limited to, SFWMD ERP and NPDES NOI b) Submit material specifications and shop drawings stamped approved by the Engineer of Record. c) The contractor shall provide the city with detailed construction mitigation plans. All construction activity regulated by the Land Development Regulations shall be performed in a manner so as not to adversely impact the conditions of adjacent properties, unless such activity is permitted to affect said property pursuant to a consent granted by the adjacent property owner, under terms or conditions agreeable to the adjacent property owner. This includes, but is not limited to, the control of dust, noise, water or drainage runoff, debris and the storage of construction materials. (LDR Ch. 2. Art. III. Sec. 3.D.3.) Impacts on emergency services, businesses, public inconvenience, disruption to multi-modal and X vehicular/pedestrian travel on roadways/sidewalks in the vicinity of construction shall be minimized. Construction mitigation plans shall include the following information (as applicable): • Construction schedule, phasing, staging, and storage • Construction fencing, ingress/egress and sight triangles • Construction personnel parking — if an off-site location is secured for this purpose, verify that a tram or shuttle will be provided between the construction site and the parking area(s) and provide a copy of the agreement with the property owner. • Construction traffic routes and delivery schedules • Dust control and street cleaning plan • Construction refuse removal in adherence to City's ordinance, Sec. 10-26(a). Contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) for a roll-off container. 1101 North Congress Ave (MSPM,ZNCV 2024.10.69688) Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT • Hours of work in adherence to City's noise ordinance Sec. 15-8 • MOT plans for proposed closures/detours affecting vehicular or pedestrian travel • Hurricane preparedness plans in the event of a hurricane warning and/or watch. 9. Prior to Engineering Final Inspection and close out of the permit, submit: a) Engineer's Drainage Certification/Recertification X b) As-builts c) Tests and reports (i.e. SWPP reports, density test reports) PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 10. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant must provide a landscaping plan that proposes the required landscaping, including foundation landscaping, required landscape island, and mechanical X equipment and dumpster screening, pursuant to City Code Part III, Chapter 4, Article II. 11. Please be aware that all proposed signage requires a Sing Permit prior to installation. All signs must be designed to follow the X Boynton Beach Promenade Master Sign Program and City Code Part III, Chapter 4, Article IV, Sign Standards. 12. An application for a variance (ZNCV-2024.10.69688) was submitted to obtain relief from the required number of parking spaces. Approval of the Major Development application (MSPM- X 2024.10.69688) is contingent upon the approval of the variance application. 13. At the time of permit submission, please submit a traffic statement X from Palm Beach County. 14. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant must provide a photometric plan prepared and sealed by a professional engineer. The photometric plans shall illustrate the same general information as that shown on the site plan, in addition to the following: 1. Detail of each type of exterior freestanding lighting fixtures, including X material, color(s), height, and sizes; 2. Illumination levels (in foot- candles), including a summary table indicating the average, minimum, and maximum foot-candle levels; 3. Certification of compliance with the latest edition of the Florida Building Code and 1101 North Congress Ave (MSPM,ZNCV 2024.10.69688) Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the capacity to withstand 140 MPH wind load; and 4. Proposed conduit routing; and 5. Utilization of Warm White LED Lighting. 15. The proposed project has a deficiency of 49 required parking spaces on-site. The applicant has requested a Variance for a reduction of the required parking space by up to 45 parking spaces within their justification statement. Due to this discrepancy, the X applicant must obtain approval for a variance reducing the required parking space by 49 for the shopping center (Boynton Beach Promenade) prior to permit submittal and intake. POLICE 16. Security measures at the construction site should include a fenced staging area to store equipment. Quality padlocks are recommended for all storage trailers and equipment trailers, and X park within staging area. Timer clock or photocell lighting for night time should be used. Keep in mind that landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways to include long- term tree canopy growth. BUILDING 17. Comments: None. All previous comments acknowledged at DART X meeting. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None. All previous comments addressed at DART meeting. FIRE 18. Once submitted for Plan Review a sub permit, for the fires sprinkler alterations on the 2nd (existing) and 3rd floor (proposed) are X required. NFPA 1.14.2 CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: TBD