Loading...
Agenda 10-24-23 Mobility Workshop The City of °4,. Boynton Beach °�r� P �4, City Commission Agenda Tuesday, October 24, 2023, 6:00 PM City Hall Commission Chambers 100 E. Ocean Avenue Boynton Beach City Commission Ty Penserga, Mayor (At Large) Thomas Turkin, Vice Mayor (District III) Angela Cruz, Commissioner (District I) Woodrow L Hay, Commissioner (District II) Aimee Kelley, Commissioner (District IV) Daniel Dugger, City Manager David Tolces, Interim City Attorney Maylee De Jesus, City Clerk Mobility Workshop *Mission* To create a sustainable community by providing exceptional municipal services, in a financially responsible manner. 't.P/G .1,,ga ,flctr tCl' tGd www.boynton-beach.org Welcome Thank you for attending the City Commission Meeting General Rules & Procedures for Public Participation at City of Boynton Beach Commission Meetings The Agenda: There is an official agenda for every meeting of the City Commissioners, which determines the order of business conducted at the meeting. The City Commission will not take action upon any matter, proposal, or item of business, which is not listed upon the official agenda, unless a majority of the Commission has first consented to the presentation for consideration and action. • Consent Agenda Items: These are items which the Commission does not need to discuss individually and which are voted on as a group. • Regular Agenda Items: These are items which the Commission will discuss individually in the order listed on the agenda. • Voice Vote: A voice vote by the Commission indicates approval of the agenda item. This can be by either a regular voice vote with "Ayes & Nays" or by a roll call vote. 1. Openings A. Call to Order - Mayor Ty Penserga Roll Call. Invocation by Commissioner Hay Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Commissioner Hay. Agenda Approval: 1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections 2. Adoption 2. Other 3. Presentation A. Presentation by Jonathan Paul, NUE Urban Concepts of the City of Boynton Beach Complete Streets Mobility Plan and proposed Mobility Fee. Discuss the Mobility Plan and next steps. 4. Adjournment Notice If a person decides to appeal to any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this meeting,He/She will need a record of the proceedings and,for such purpose,He/She may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.(F.S.286.0105) The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City.Please contact the City Clerk's office,(561) 742-6060 or(TTY)1-800-955-8771,at least 48 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Additional agenda items may be added subsequent to the publication of the agenda on the City's web site.Information regarding items added to the agenda after it is published on the City's web site can be obtained from the office of the City Clerk. 10/24/2023 <4 OYNTON - 4? . ,4104 tn o �. „ . . M°eILITY FSE MOBILITY WORKSHOP OCTOBER 24, 2023 y wr+rav4 , MOBILITY WORKSHOP tzaSP • Overview of Mobility, Mobility Fees and Why • Review and status of Mobility Plan • Review and Status of Mobility Fee Technical Report • Legal Challenge Outcome • Mobility Fee Options • Next Steps 1 10/24,/2023 , C:4'" - MOBILITY WORKSHOP C:4'" t4 Commission Consensus regarding: • Update of the Complete Streets Mobility Plan • Update of Mobility Fee Technical Report • Mobility Fee Option Selection Jonathan B. Paul, AICP , Principal,NUE Urban Concepts,LLC a Over 25 years of land use,transportation&impact!mobility fee experience. *• Masters in Urban&Regional Planning from University of Florida and Masters Niiin Public Administration from University of South Florida.141111 Served as Concurrency&Impact Fee Manager for Alachua County&Interim tt Transportation Planning Director for Sarasota County. Created the 1st Mobility Plan and Mobility Fee in Florida. Completed Mobility Plans&Fees: Alachua,Sarasota&Osceola Counties Cities of Altamonte Springs,Dade City,DeBary,Maitland,Miami Beach,Palm Beach Gardens,Venice&West Palm Beach. NUE URBAN CONCEPTS Mobility Plans&Fees Underway: Cities of Bradenton,North Port,St. LAND USE •MOBILITY• PARKING • FEES Augustine,St.Cloud&Tallahassee.Miami-Dade,Leon,Okaloosa&Walton www.nueurbanconcepts.com Counties&Sarasota County update. ©2021 NUE Urban Concepts,LLC.All Rights Reserved 2 10/24/2023 Complete Streets Mobility Plan gEETs Mo & Mobility Fee v ' OF gOYNTON o Mobility Plan is a vision • over the next " "oars _ ' o For MovingPeople W 00 I 1 .. .. •• Mobility Fee is a simple, II :: '•' •' •• transparent way .,. . ...d *rue •.• �o ueveio�pment • to Dav for IV • • impact to the transportation system. 410/31L.TY F Why is the City Developing a Mobility Fee? • To ensure fees paid by new development in the City are expended in a timely manner within or adjacent to the City to provide mobility projects •1'r ., �...�..�:. ,.. ��rv�� : , • To ensure the City has the ability to prioritize mobility projects that best meets the needs of the City • To advance mobility projects through Bonding, Florida State Infrastructure Bank, public/private partnerships, etc. • To potentially replace transportation concurrency & proportionate share & road impact fees 2023 NUE Urban Concepts,LLC.All Rights Reserved 3 10/24/2023 , 41 I How are Impact Fees different from Mobility Fees? m Impact r' • Primary purpose to fund adding road capacity • Based on general per mile cost of capacity, not specific projects • Based on vehicle miles of travel • Utilizes segment-based road level of service (LOS) standards Mob itty heec: • Spent to fund bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, transit & roads • Based on multimodal projects in Mobility Plan • Based on person miles of travel • Utilizes areawide LOS standards & multimodal QOS standards QOS = Quality of Service .00.1.4..‘ !!2021 to 2023 Collection: $1,251,116!! 4r R 4_ ' P B Røad I mC pact Total Collections per YR 2003 $ 1,208,289.00 2003 to 2020 Expenditures $1,096,226 2004 $ 3,339,365.00 2003 to 2020 Collection $30,050,685 zoos $ 5,572,449.00 2006 $ 6,421,101.00 u..rr,., 2007 $ 1,121,407.00 �Re4 r y r . es 2008 $ 1,712,978.00 nolo. Expen.entiaes TRW pee Yr 'nr.541.. ¢. rate.. 2003 Congrl0 Are•Menes,Rd/M.0W. 37200 $ 47200 $ - $ 2009 $ 147,172.00 Gateway 6Nd.-Militny T3106n1.., 5 208.00 $ S • 2001 lawyer¢96Gatewar!l6 odlac 1660.00 5 1,294.00 $ S 2010 $ 105,842.00 2005 0 5 - 5 $ S • 2006 0 5 5 • s s • 2011 $ 170,323.00 2037 0 3 5 • 5 - 5 2003 0 5 s s s • 2012 $ 624,767.00 2009 WOo0.0 6!Corper.eDr•Saa0res161,4 $ 71.17300 $ 71.17 5 $ • 2013 $ 912,538.00 2010 Wcolb*6331 Rd!00,r,orate Dr-Seac,est Pled 5 2541400 5 25.414.00 5 5 2011 350400 4/Corp D1S.0,,69,610d 5 269,16700 5 269,167.00 5 5 2014 $ 663,777.00 0012 0co10,00194/0070orale Dr Se serest.MS339961.00 S 339.011.00 S 5 • 2013 0 5 s $ s 2015 $ 2,451,262.00 2014 0 5 5 5 s 701$ Gateway Bled 6High Ridge#AIntenec0on $ 44278.00 5 44.57¢.07 S • 5 2016 $ 1,659,649.00 2016 Gateway Wed 1 High Ridge Rd lntera.60n $ 95764.00 5 9576400 X5023rd Ave And 7040131 9,17 war intersection 5 1.42100 5 1 421 00 2017 Gateway Blvd 0 Me R.6393dlneen.c9on $ 14,59100 5 24511.00'5013,4 Ave And federal Kinn.01¢71 clan $ 1452400 5 1882400 2017 $ 694,860.00 2037 Gateway 86031 High Ridge Rd lnten.tlon t3277.00 5 3.27700 6E23,04.An0 federal WV..intersection 5 17.444.00 s 17,449.00 2018 $ 773,199.00 W 6010'390.R0 Sescrca&rd In8enectbn 347 W 2019 Gateway IDA 1 High Rrge Rd intersection $ 15.71300 5 1606000 502330 Ave And federal Hignwar Intersection 5 642600 S 6,82600 2019 $ 1,680,288.00 Gateway lied1 High RAR¢Rd Irnene Ion $ 5100700 SS noble.0d 5cacresc 4lydlnle,Occon 5 70.174.00 2020 $ 791,419.00 Mew Rd.and Congress Ave 6tte,section $ 11.375.00 2020 Gateway 1603.l Lawrence b.Intersection $ 11.991.00 5 146.547.00 5t 23r4 Ave AM 1Oderal 11104a,It t.sedan 5 13,391.00 5 13,194.00 Total Expenditures 444 tans 4 $ 1,013,312,40 /Total Eape ditures for Zone S $ 57,91440 $ Total Expenditures for Zone 4 and 5 $ 1,096,226.00 30,050,685.00 4 10/24/2023 ci * , PBC Road Impact ara ES3edent0,espe,YR •t ata Collections per YR 57,000.00000 2003 to 2020 Expenditures $1,096,226 56.000003.00 2003 to 2020 Collection $30,050685 Ss.99o.9oo.ro !!2021 to 2023 Collection: $1,251,116!! !!20 YEARS Collection: $31,301,801!! 5300000000 92,000030 LE 51.00000000 I 5 _. _. .. II I I _ _I __I .1 1003 2202 2006 2007 2001 2009 2010 3011 2012 2013 2014 2011 2016 2017 2011 2019 2020 Yew I iQt ' =�fr� r Questions for Palm Beach County BoCC or Staff • What projects has the County built with $31 million? • Where in Boynton Beach has this money been spent? • The 2045 Long Range Plan shows no road capacity east of 95, what does the County intend to construct in the future • The City has real needs today in 2023, not 20 years in the future. How is the County going to fund those needs? 2023 NUE Urban Concepts,LLC.All Rights Reserved 5 10/24/2023 Planned Road Improvements %two location Proir-rt Description '1 mrce Existing Plans I-95ptewaydInterchange lnnts FDOrgi • Future Land Use & 1-95 Woolbright Rd Interchange Improvements FDOT 1-95 Boynton Beach Blvd Interchange Improvements FDOT I Transportation Elements I-91- Boynton Beach Blvd NW 8th St to NW 3rd St Interchange Improvements FDOT • BB CRA Redevelopment yOld Boynton Rd Boynton Beach Blvd ti s■ry Intersection Improvements FDOT J Plan J Congress Ave Miner Rd Intersection Improvements FDOT • BB Greenway, Blueway, & Gateway Blvd Lawrence Rd R, Intersection Improvements FDOT ppp Trails Plan ` Miner Rd High Ridge Rd Intersection Improvements FDOT I� • BB Climate Action Plan SE 23rd Ave Federal Hwy 1111111111IntersectionImprovements FDOT F! • CIP / Existing Planned woolbdght Rd Seocres?Blvd Intersection Improvements FOOT �I Improvements High Ridge Rd Gateway Blvd to Roadway Widening LktP • Roadway Capacity Miner Rd Improvement Projects Miner Rd E4 Canal to Roadway Widening LRTP High Ridge Rd table 10 Roadway Capacity Improvement Projects ter.`'j.'t )* 2045 LRTP : LOS Conditions . 0 s"I 1 N.f] l j1___ f r, w v. t7 z r 0 1 ' O ti e l I BOYNTpN BCH BLVD OWN r• 1 JI.. Fi I C3 Woolbrigh l r 1` i ' z (2—Z 6 10/24/2023 lk t: 2045 LRTP : Road Capacity ). ei High Rtd • t ✓1 I Gatewa BF' "167-4 I I+ Integrated i into CoBB Id Boynton Ra Complete IIIIi Streets `z Mobility Plan P _. o I a PI ) ' I at 5W23:: e ..� . ., ...., ,try try CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Iipi.41b4Cr, AAP! REETc ,1• Y --%11 .-----1VI0BILITY PLAN , I:I NUE URBAN CONCEPTS � I LAIN USE•MOelFltt•PARKING•FEES ' fi. _-. _ •.'_ .c .- DEVELOP COMPLETE STREET PROJECT COST L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & ... TRANSPORTATION PLANS PREPARE PLANNING-LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR EACH COMPLETE STREETS PROJECT EVALUATE FUTURE GROWTH POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, ' ON 1('RAICITY &TRAFFIC DEMONSTRATED e "' - ' NEED (1ST OF THE DUAL RATIONAL NEXUS TEST) - MULTIMODAL CAPACITY X C ESTABLISH QUALITY OF PROJECT LENGTH SERVICE (QOS) STANDARDS DEVELOP COMPLET ..S BICYCLING, STREETS,TRANSIT, MOBILITY PLAN &WALKING COMPILE CAPACITY, COST, & PROJECT PRIORITIZATIONS A ESTABLISH COMPLETE STREETS PROJECTS BIKE LANES, PATHS, SIDEWALKS, ©2021 NUE Urban Concepts,LLC.All Rights Reserved, STREETS,TRAILS,TRANSIT www.nueurbanconcepts.com 000® CIRCULATOR &TRANSIT STATION 7 10/24/2023 t F F f %re KAI' AAA Alt'.4114.. WALKING aStstiti _Z�,�0 ;�� C'.) A CYCLING MOVINGTRANSIT P EOPLE .,iai, A, ti, iMICRO MOBILITY s 1 LOW SPEED VEHICLE PROVIDING CHOICES - ° MOBILITY iii , i MOTOR VEHICLE NUE URBAN CONCEPTS pia LAND USE•MOBILITY•PARKING•FEES ES I G� ©2021 NUE Urban Concepts,LEC.All Rights Reserved.wwwnueurbanconcepts.com (DQ fQ© if a t! ~ ■ Quality of Service 4:11010' Moving towards Vision Zero STREET QUALITY OF SERVICE (QOS) APPLICABLE LOCATIONS (SKU)1 MICROMOBILITY SPEED LIMITS l0 l 51DI.WALKS/PATHS/TRAILS 1 l SILLY LOW SPELD STRLLTS/MAIN QUALITY OF SERVICE(QOS)A. 15 S /LOCAL S • / RESIDENTIAL CITY S S HO LOCAL STREETS/ twit QUALITY OF SERVICL(QOS)B RESIDENTIAL CITY STREETS/ 20 MINOR/SELECT COLLECTORS SKI QUALITY 0. SERVICE (005)C COLLECTORS/ 25 MINOR/SELECT ARTERIALS sr41t QUALITY OF SERVICE(QOS)0 MAJOR COLLECTORS/ARTERIALS 30 OPCEO QUALITY OF SERVICE(005)5 ' LLIBI PRINCIPAL ARRilliallaRk CI BA N coNapis 35 ARTERIALS ....:.a:h•.,.i;:•..•::u...o•••...••o.:••...npo,.0011.. Mai041104 8 10/24/2023 �•o ,4 '‘ Level of Service vs Quality of Service Level of Service (LOS): Accept Congestion • Evaluate road capacity • Basis for transportation concurrency • Based on vehicle speed & congestion • Appropriate when widening roads & intersections Quality of Service (QOS): Plan for Safety • Emphasize Safe movement of all people, not just cars • Design roads for desired speed of travel, not existing speeds • Design speed = Posted Speed: Want 20 MPH design for it • Can use areawide LOS standards & street QOS standards • Defined Area or Citywide 40, ! FIGURE 5. STREET QUALITY OF SERVICE (QOS) STANDARDS MOVING TOWARDSg o+, - ���>wdwrd..;dddreg ncuc, VISION ZERO I ou: Fasuva.v t,P" 10 AA)OtA,kAAA 0% DOwNlOwN STRUT OOAMIR 01 SlRVK! +'NS^ht•!.'. DES*NAT ED QDk 20 i i i ' X ` -X i I ioot;STANDARDS �-' - '� ARIAS IO�A� ANSKAMI!WU1igN5 LL /n1LL•/(}`/n� y J^� wn 5% MICROMOUILITY SPEED LIMITS 10 1'15 WS�YInWinMII�S{MAlSf5810 FAOIIRS IM[, 30 y Mtk 1111 45% ® rxr. sum KUL IOW SEEN.MAI UAW n QUALITY OF SERVICE;0051 A' 20 t 111/111 j* j* /}�{ QUALITY OF SERVICE COSIfi 20 $SLLLD" I E6IXNIOIDSflls"1(In WIE8 muCIOAS 40 " • 85% Z5; T1H1S QUALITY OF SERVICE;COSI C ;, W@Q ,M10A AlEC1t1►SFLFC MSWS H,gber.peed reduce nol only the r ht d,Yonce 6"&, 0 A SRF(fS@Src��o,lime driver needy b avo;d o<oYia;on QUALITY OF SERVICE 00S130 35 MAAA WOKS AAIfl..l5 r,SuitIrorO1 ,.0)^ QUALITY OF SEYVICE,00SIE•• ®+ 4'0+ RE/41 Mind S81CLIADS - IRIS •. �'1 NMI i XNPII •P.te nnc v,w?rrrn to.W Ste» :v.tAr._In 1=ts twin r FL71WWrraml ULr4.f� Fct tp - t .{•= iiI'�uoe' ...malgeWtI 809;Ei 70 F!X i �`� 9 10/24/2023 , vr.Y "�Xfi' CSM Improvements , Legend i L�� -•• Legend t ' L Canoed kayak launch ' ...� • w ... i ara� .M^^„ r m Fuue Et.m. I _,-. BlueraYS Gosatrps _ _,,_,_„�,-,,,ti current m werr sod». r ._cm Booroa _ — (fr. / . Blueway Bike Pedestrian f r `= t'' 1Land Assessment �7 Ls-� - Do ______ Mobility Oriented Districts J Il_ _ �j Multimodal Mobility Hub = highest level of I accessibility & mobility f,.. ..1.1 .1 I 1. TriRail MOD 2. Woolbright MOD - = I 3. Medical MOD 3 �; Mobility = bicycling, walking, scooting, neighborhood electric vehicle circulators, ride bus L of l•ynd L_ -- r' 1.Tri-Roil MMD or rail, drive cars, shared mobility with uber or lyft 3: ;090v 10 10/24/2023 , ',.,. .'' F'' #CSM Improvementst4 vzsto _ __ _ . .._ _ Legends �- � ."- -- Mobility Hubs �_ 5. 7:::: ....,.. Mobility Districts tom""'".a1..._ •Po -- w Existing Designated a t .q.4 _, _„ _ Bike Lanes I �..,_. �. -M �; " Existing Undesignated L' Ili�� --- ..... Bike Lanes t �*• _,----.---N � Existing Paved Trail ' , ....^ .r--..•...- ----- _v. Proposed Designated r_ II ��a . -• Bike 4111,iii . -- ProposeShared w' ..... '`*.-._, Use Path w �� _'--"---•---"' � Proposed Paved Trail �' ----- - `:;F7r CSM Improvement: .: 1----L Transit . W../ I 1 € Legend z , 1 1 Commuter Train Stations 4 14 _Florida East Coast Railway w„e.q _South Florida Regional i • -People Mover g sw,,,,... j - Rat_Network . O City Boundary ie i ifiti 11 10/24/2023 , ,•. . . . St. ) u . usti ne .4 x A, tip "� No PIYM!Man,RIR . A, 4' run,[New's,'I is \ili� Y .PP�n talion..... • p / s G' \trawl YM • i• - Ix.u.VW a * ttPMNw J �• mutt ntN q inn-- J • *' I I • ''.,. II . Willerilleall. NUE URBAN CL. I.' I'"i, cl1 iifSlrr� ri, „� . Bradenton .t .= . , e +f x, ..4 • Bradenton 2040 Beadle to Downtowns I Mobility Plan Park-Once Plan • 7 ,..•F i ' IONAMPA YNCI a I, 4 t ,. .. A.0 <1:...c....1.„1,21--' t In.tvt°OKc=aro.: r HOST I IAI111.1 NU/11117Y DISTRICT OIKU ItN(_A I :L riE:T1roPTr l lT'lla0.. `.IIq\ I lf'V. 1 •hcoullA100 ,,-i' -.I P.. n.x...va.. - OBIU Y101511110 11 wr - NSIM _ :_-� C[N1pNAAGLIRA ncnNM GN swlor. f111>„r^ n+n Q I I_I 0II 'fl 12 10/24/2023 , • ,.........Awft....„ lea.."—Q , Walton NUE URBAN CONCEPTS WO TZE•KEISY•RR IC•FEES ;.;•i y '.t '00 ...... latissio, _ . .g., ,„,....=.1. . . • 1 Z yAo...-.7... / 4D r:;„i• —lt„, ,=:, l ..„ •-.... --..........,.., • ..„:1.--,,=.'.. . . —,t 1 mcz2,vg.r, %b. • ' ma Li ——, , . --.:.. . ...••,. 2040 IVALION COUNTY MOBILITY PLAN 120 .. — ... ..: ,,...„,.. .. pum.....000.10.11.14.5 •Ca......11411Y11.11s ....- FF"g.S.Fi'l'glErila: ="':•.±."4"1:"'‘.72....e. : , n• .,,-,,.,...,.... L.. fro143."...ri..i711 ',MO, ...11.=:...... iy.-..... ID 'd '\ i 4 k Lake Park ,rd i ranaif Cin ulatur Pion F'......d P.m I(Premed WM In.n.Cad. o • DOMIld Ross R0 . 11:"... • . als1(...Wet Pus; 1.41.11•1116.1. a Trent Cr..Non, i.anst bag.,So... •........“1).151..,11.11.,0...7.r Fv5t, 1 a - r 2045 LAKE PARK rallir 111 „,....,......... .............. 0 ....T.........., • ....... I 0"""'"'" — " mufti..HObIlity liStrIrt'Wel 0........,,........... Iii nu.mairorm ,... ,- la .. '' :...'',PIVElit .0$.,1 4--• ' ' ''' •---7.., .6.-.7-4 da..:;... '..."'"_".•' ...--.. 1 4..., ,„.. .; PGA Blvd rl . Burns Rd -,:, „, '! *" ''.,-• `1.''. ''' V 84 i f. Cp 1 ti ..1- 6.) 1.....1 .. .. ., „. • 4 NOrthlake Blvd 13 10/24/2023 ,....,...—.„ St. Au • ustine 117:Arfit --- . 11•11.," 4 . War. Ai_ Project Area _--......, 4.411•444414, :T ' E_ E E D D E C ro --Lii --- — . .- ai7.9d- ,-,..• r__--q--P1 r• V..tr. f., VINEMOPIPPONIEVIsqlEi+1 ks ss ...t....i. ----- .,... s .1', • nit . . s i-i. '..--77..0 ..-f: ':; .' ' '— II , ,.X •' ,...-"'I . 114.41 • 1 14''''* '11 9':. 7....- 1 ' ' ' 41. ; ' • I ••• - - " ' - • c f`P,:,:t PI,_ ' -, ' - , t c.., ', ,r400N,t-".:..- ,iT,..,. •,1.,.,1 •F ii, - !,t.r,-'• , ,:i••••-•,,i ki lit. ,0 p. i ,! . -- i tem1', tr '. !Ara 7 - :i., _ & i 0 006 0 1 0 214des logal Legend 0 inf.• 11=1 PrOON IA,I/ 4. ,••••••••.‘ 1 g $ieve I Boum Cape Parlong Cables Vs Pm.Ownevs1, 1: 14'tAl Public Parking ,INge.•, .....,•, „1:."/"Ireig • ---11 Pr . cr•rit"Ir 11,..e.o., Ortli'4,=Cap ..••.• . I., "11" N:15 *crLilfR.,,,t= litzgAIre 7:Afternoon Occupancy Heat Map ®r, i ip ta no Pi—..... • - r . .Lim . .-...- i ..., irxraNai lip --...*•ITN, , k , 4, 1 Morafki, 111111.9111111F,Z,‘d ... 1.-- ' •— ...... :c_:..C.,7111,„., ___L__L ......e f Ar 1 4'Eir ' •• 1...4....•-•0.1,•••••••••••••••••••••••1•••••••••••• ... ...ill 1 ,r''; ' t"' - •••' ....... Fra*S Op seul 011 anti Parluns _ 11 1 II \ , Wend 0.......r• . "AIN1.10.01.11/ 70•,/"' Fr .-..e-R fg..etfr., :,- kfiq -.-1_...::. Paved Parks*Catv t 9118'0 r::,.-V':-*t:1,r:„ -- , -111-315,f3_ ,,,.„ ,.... 0.- rOrzet ,!-g-{"Ilff161, --- till •••_ •— ._. ,..........— _ ex...... FR4 1 . - , , •1•i' -t, 1 _ il NV Pig r i ...=.4 Ili ' iir -." -- -0--i-% ..... ... ._... : ,.. c,„ -...... ,..... _ ......... h.MOM.11 :=4"::*.- 0 - a... 2 a... 14 10/24/2023 STEP %ems 010 �'(� 3 .. „, , t,, , . . iii "/�, i 1 �P IMPLEMENTI t&4 ORDINANCES # j'-IMPLEMENT A 4 I BI �° ADMINISTRATION 0 LE.Ey $® 01 &ASSESSMENT • STEP :I.COMPREHENSIVE P L ''LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,S mom V >-.SITE ACCESS/IMPACT ASSES,;' LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ® A�iii PITAL IMPROVEMENTS • "' ELEMENT& PROGRAM 0 STEP MOBILITY 1r' I LAND USE !���� 2 PLAN i TRANSPORTATION PARKING X52021 NUE Urban Wncepts ERC Ail Rights Re,,,, NUE URBAN CONCEPTS ❑Xg.-w9,.,•uln 4,HES al www.nueurbancancepts.com®001i) `' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH •-=+ib * X NUE URBAN CONCEPTS -` N llCOMPLETE STRI I NUELANDURBAN . . �� MOBILITY REE : � ESIelem® - I0fi1. =n'tn A ., _ 1 system EVALUATE EXISTING TRAFFIC CALCULATE RATE ATTRIBUTABLE TO 1 BACKLOG/DEFICIENCY NEW GROWTH ((COMPLETE STREET COST X NGEF) -AF)/PMT INCREASE CONVERT FUTURE VEHICLE . ITRAVEL TO PERSON TRAVEL FP (VEHICLE TRAVEL X PERSON CALCULATE ROUGHLY MOBILITY TRAVEL FACTOR=PMT) PROPORTIONAL IMPACT ((((TRIPS X%NEW)X PERSON TRIP ASSESSMENT IP FACTOR)X(PERSON TRIP LENGTH X LIMITED ACCESS FACTOR))X ORIGIN &DESTINATION FACTOR) AREA ($=SUM SYMBOL)OF PERSON 1 CAPACITY BY MODE - 4 PMT.X PTDu=MOBILITY FEE EXISTING AND PROJECTED FUNDING SOURCES SPEND FEES IN DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FEE PAYERS THE BENEFIT OF INCREASED MOBILITY(2ND OF DUAL Stays in RATIONAL NEXUS TEST) CALCULATE COST ATTRIBUTABLEcurrent TO NEW GROWTH DEVELOP MOBILITY TECHNICAL 1� INCREASE IN PMT/INCREASE REPORT TO DOCUMENT:DATA, IN PMC METHODOLOGY,LEGAL,AND system STATUTORY COMPLIANCE 15 10/24/2023 . ,,,,kik i,, ) . . MOBILITY FEE BENEFIT DISTRICT r !' MOBILITY FEE Where Fees ASSESSMENT can be r AREA expended to provide Fees are mobility assessed at f building Written i permit finding to • !' spend outside MS . '- assessment area ~ Vit► r' 1E4x* Legal Challenge Outcome (0) Both local governments can charge fees, defend own fee (2) Although Statutorily burden of proof on those who assess the fee: ➢ Should submit a study justifying reduction or replacement ➢ Study should be data driven to support reduction or replacement ➢ Study should look beyond just need since County fee not plan based ➢ Look at congestion, travel, trip reduction, and need ➢ Look at past expenditures and contributions ➢ Future steps based on response to the request 16 10/24/2023 g , �sfix,' Mobility Fee Options ft.* (1) Quickest: Charge a City Mobility Fee & collect Impact Fee for County • Lake Park, Palm Beach Gardens, Royal Palm, Wellington • City would charge for City & possibly State road impacts • Development would pay City and County • Development would have to challenge City and / or County if it does not want to pay the calculated rates r " MobilityOptionsFee •42..0 (2) Recommended Approach based on recent court case: • Complete Mobility Fee Study • Submit a formal impact fee request to the County • Request (impact fee reduction or replacement) based on study results • No local government has submitted a formal request • Request money County collected be spent on projects in City • Receive written response from the County regarding Request 17 10/24/2023 efilili ;r Mobility Fee Options ft..* (3) Likely Legal Challenge: Adopt City Fee as Replacement of County Fee • Complete Mobility Fee Study • Adopt Ordinance • Stop collecting County Fee, just collect City Fee Recommend before taking this step to formally submit study and request to the County & wait to receive written response from County • Maybe able to appeal decision to BoCC • Appeal decision through Circuit Court, burden of proof on County l''g i f� IABI1 I9 MOBILIMPROVEMENTS O ITV N COUNTY ROADS Yf, 1ACI E 10 2045 ARE.4VYI Dt VM1 fl VMC ANALYSIS BY OWNERSHIP .4 6.4MRM ur MAC Government Entity Length(miles) Lane Wes 2045 VMT 2045 VMC A»r.rfo Glades COL On Road 12.04(4A)1Fi 501,837,920111.28%) 195,063(6.5270 City 148.35 424.25 3,172,360 3,850,260 itoMl40e8 Reed IMO $47,728,{91(6.m%) 126,10(4.22%) County 45.97 110.73 600,520 988,420 42121103* Pelma Vista Blvd 1.9610.73%) 51,471,98810.19%) 7,0061024%) HOA 3.10 12.38 51,180 107,400 State 7.80 46.82 403,100 467,400 Range Una Road 4.10(2.27%) $29,2180,000(19.10%) 91,170(1.04%) St.lames Road/250. 334(1.24%) 51,910.849(0.25%) 10,01710.33%) fa City 72.3% 71.4% 75.0% 71.12% Walton Road 3.10(1,15%1 512,444,716(1.62%) 11,741(1.06%) County 22.4% 18.6% 14.21% 18.26% C -ininfini 1404 1.5% 2.1% 1.21% 1.98% .•=1 4•01.....y r. 10........04.. `..re.ma.iwux.40/... .,.044,64.rr.,,w.e»m.u..v,w�w...s.. .r, 3.8% 7.9% 8.63% a„w..r,a.e a.rrr.«x...1014•asaur a 1..e<rr.w1....a u.,..r,..r..a.16eunulummionmplomonesli m.*AIa.��rr....rwaly.r.w.wr..w.rwr....r..... IMF Swam NW Chatanne.k.aolr O.y1ar,..a,I.a5.s.ry R.0,.,,,'.e..rl I.0W1.0.0rva*410.9 at, 022 AREAWIDE VMT&VMC ANALYSIS BY OWNERS TABLE 9 2021 CC VNIT&V . Ly OWNERSHIP Government Entity Length(m884) Lane Maes 2022 VMT 2022 VMC Government Entity Length(miles) Lane MOW 2022 VMT 2022 VMC City 72.3% 71.4% 73.38% 71.12% City 148.35 424.25 1,948,920 3,850,260 County 22.4% 18.6% 13.22% 18.26% County 45.97 110.73 351,140 988,420 140A 1.5% 2.1% 0.44% 1.98% NOA 3.10 12.38 11,730 107,400 State 3.8% 7.9% 12.96% 8.63% State 7.80 46.82 344,100 467,400 18 10/24/2023 ,dte..ra..„ a Q 13 4 City of Port St.Lucie N 4.3'let Phase Two Mobility Plan&Mobility Fee;Select Distrlcts a.rwc«r„. 0.1 SI cal . a.nT ,...M.o..- slam . swam n. ICJ Pat 5t.Lucie Cay Limits wee, a .«. taw s Ho mot 11,M • •rw.a“,,..«,KI DOA .<.. 4,. ,..".".n....® rt eh 1 n. , T.„ .e 9.sYM 95 • • • ..,nnwa..City tun Mee Made erer.,NrN.m.ce..l ,0:7 • wwt MAIL xsM Tont 107 z. • w.nv nem rata lw0 067. 13 1 _ ,n 9 n w 211 ,(,,• . If*4i • lii. . . • -_-- 6 6 r,ri Nllt WWI COC[PIS o A ,en.,e. Indiantown could justify between 0% and 30% on Indiantown Mobility Fees be set aside for ii A il 01Al County Roads.An additional alternative is taking a simple average of the following six(6)variables evaluated for 2045 in this Technical Report:(1)capacity need(0%);(2)VMT(30%);(3)Cost(2%); (4)Attributable Cost(10%);(5)Martin County Travel(18%);and(6)Rural District Travel(26%).The simple average results in a 14.38%share(0.863/6=.1438). TABLE 2S.COUNTY MITIGATION VahldaMobility Attributable Martin Martin County Year Mlles of Rural District Travel Plan Cast Mobility Plan Cort County Travel Travel TABLE 4.2022 AREAWIDE VMT&VMC ANALYSIS 2022 29.7% - 25.50% 23.00% Guvemmant Length VMT to VMC Ratio 2045 30.0% 2A% 1&276 1 11.07% 26.03% Entity (miles) UM Miles 2022 VMT 2022 VMC (VMT/VMC) T....:neves...r veva ear at Tra,..r..ya•r.rrt.rrrarm.,,.m.a.r4,a o 5.Ik..«<.n,y.of waanrN..oe.•ar.ara.yrr.a+earsrrrrr.lrar.rt rr...«I.0.u,eww FUNK,P...cw., travel Within Village , m Cory re amtael MMSOaMr.r.w.n..rarew,4.wr.awaar Maur,Pm 0 me 111 n.Femmes..e .rve Uvnar Trrew u eemte dor MD(Tale.19).6.•Nam.tresm Demme Medear.r MO O .T,I.T County 901 19.63 20,512 es,277 0.24 a tas. .ra GaryDet00 na rr..a.1,611,61.1aa.4..eryr am in MT(1,2•41-0...Ie.*Tr•R;W,r,a,.wa,i Oa.«Tws V.I.,n. State 4.35 11.50 45,678 99,388 0 Village 6.02 12.04 2,907 27,285 0.11 TAKE 23.2022 STUDY AREA VMT&VMC ANALYSIS Government Total 20.19 43.17 69,097 211,950 0.33 Nulty /meth lw Mks 2022 VMT 2022 VMK VMT/VMC~� Percentage of Travel Within Village Irma!wnhin snort Arra - . County 41.6% 45.5% 29.7% 40.2% -- [Canty 61.27 122.64 172,654 546,395 0.22 11.14 616) 247.19 44z,s64 1,041,300 Mal 21.6% 26.6% 66.1% 46.9% -- Alai. 602 52.01 2,907 27,2.5 0.11 Village 29.8% 27.9% 4.2% 12.9% Total 130.94 143.96 618,137 1,655,121 0.37 Total 1000% 100% 10034, 100% y+.Iwo....ria.r.Mr.a~er�o.w+.[«w M,wr'.0 Sacra,M Me tos..Ma n am...Trani.CMM..rrH0.0.a[apv,+,r t1 TMMammal 401t.Mora.the Traffic Wr.nrrM 510*0*Mama Iran Vet Mime Cemerme1001.MMT a Dame m MOT,Imre teemed marmot 55414Wrlm ."••,'O1i°'r,l•� th.Gorr c.,.,rV..44m M....2....in...non re,,em....nal m 4M MOT 4a,eray.20 We.10,9.14.1) 19 10/24/2023 • ~w ,t. Martin County 2022 Trip Origin&Destination Evaluation NUEUURB PiTTSftt1Ureplan (Using StreetLight 2021-2022 travel data) I14130•KIM•Putwc•RR 01101111011.41 95 ilikNI Bel9xtW ht881119be 8yW 7 NI tailee9tamt ,u „ bedew( raegw k. 8AlggfW .Ill a Q gMtYg8MltltaYtsYla SI. TABLE 19 ORIGIN&DESTINATION EVALUATION 4 ANON COUNTY Origin/Destination Ea 7D.gtbn EI® as i Indiantown(Districts 1186119) 3,651 3,651 7,307 47.9% Con Mobility Area(Districts 120,121,•126)1.3 479®® Wast of Turnpike(122,123,124,125,127) 565 554 1,119 7.3% tas Greater Stuart(130 to 137)® 711®® Greater Hope Sound 1128 6129) 164 164 328 2.2% , External to Martin County LOIS ECI® Total 7,638 7,597 15,235 100% - Martin County(Excluding Indiantown)®mam® Indiantown&External 5,686 5,669 25,148 74.5% Total Ira 7,597 15,235 4%. a • �osz+k3 dp TABLE 4.2022 AREAWIDE VMT&VMC ANALYSIS BY OWNERSHIP TABLE 11.ORIGIN&DESTINATION EVALUATION Origin/Destination Trips 7np Government Entity Length(miles) Lane Miles 2022 VMS 2022 VMC 94rcentage City 18.25 63.98 269,184 490,868 City of Oviedo(Core Mobility Ana) 243,726 100% Core Mobility Area internal 111,336 49% County 21.48 56.22 322,936 483,578 Orange County Trips 44,094 18% Core Mobility Area Internal B Orange County 162,430 67% State 17.98 69.88 701,174 914,671 Mobility Study Arca 343,740 100% L. Total 57.71 190.08 1,293,294 1,889,062 Mobility Study Area Internal 192,809 56% Pr City 31.6% 33.7% 20.8% 26.0% Orange County Trips 62,369 24% Mobility Study Area Internal L orange County 275 171 g0% � a County 37.2% 29.6% 25.0% 25.6% East Seminole County 645,534 100% F State 31.2% 36.8% 54.2% 48.4% East Seminole County Internal 408,860 63% Orange County Trips 149,346 23% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% fast genNtoie County a Ontlge County 958,206 e% ..r 1.040 W 1..brr.a.rr.4 rrr.Wa8...a.a.e,taeas0M.41a..nrn,tau rebW.r.er Arrow'Trallo C.•r‘E teen..Dna for the Mob6ly Study Ara.(Append..81_IM mobility Itudy Mea od fro,lime,(IPA,A Al oV,,61.11karYaY..16.r.YYo Set ..ate afr &n.t pr.r el.O..r tw.ael..•••••••••A raw.ep.A bras Dales..rr..4rwP 811...g...rr1Slo .4..assert+.ar..raa4..1. 0MWba.Ma.YM.ddanionoAeO.ratYrMwb.arn14r41aro 111.11 li0.1t M.as4M.aMt4 yr r oad.r tw atYe r..a r prier....sass.torr Cass.b,rr t.err ar s r re.01M.r a omp suaN as.sash rta al r r r was pye 4 Nr t*a cru s.Nduon asp.err t ep w M r r a.ra aw rtr.S....btrrra fan eg Omar r MWrn.4M swami Ron Om.torh fora r Gra Mrhyrar fa /Nun Mew MIarro Goo* 20 10/24/2023 rg , N. 2022 Trip Origin & Destination Evaluation NUE URBAN CONCEPTS Q4',1m+ AO OSE•0001)11)•PAANING•EE(S (Using Streetlight 2021-2022 travel data) 4111111110 I , ON Oviedo City Boundary TABLE 12.ORIGIN&DESTINATION EVALUATION DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS) Q Core Mobility Area Origin/Destination Trips pertTrayentNe Mobility Study Area IIII Downtown Oviedo(District 36) 37,187 100% E73t Seminole County ®© O Oiatnict Boundaries 6 Orange County Trips 7,313 20% 12 C Orange County Con Mobility Area Intennl&Orange County .. Mobility Study Area Internal 23,105 62. rt 4 , Area Mobility Study Aa Internal&Orange County ® st ® u - East Seminole County Internal 27,598 74% 26 East Seminole County Internal&Orange County®© mee = IJP \, Oviedo Southeast of Mitch Hammock Rd&SR 434(District 39) 25,148 100% Con Mobility Area Internal 12,625 50% It 44 /`IL Orange County Trips 5,654 22% 4 1110=11111E3 - „i !ilk,4 - Mobility Study Area Internal 15,780 61% 11 lir „ .. ,„ ._======1_13 East Seminole County Internal 17,440 69% IL 4e 1 45 23,04 MEM I ,, l L U y- , 02.5 5Ri ) E I A of°.p e.t0 Fk . t Next Steps : StudyCompletion It.o. • Update Complete Streets Mobility Plan - been almost two years • Update Mobility Fee Technical Report - been 1 % years since complete • Task based on City + County Fees, or request to reduce Impact Fees • Update to include specific information to support request based on: > Existing conditions (LOS, Over Capacity, Needed Improvements) > Share of travel on City, County, State Roads > Cost of Mobility Plan Projects on City, County & State Roads ➢ Community Capture of trips in Boynton Beach 21 10/24/2023 1'142." )1 Next Steps If elect to charge City Mobility Fee in addition to County Impact Fee: ➢ Develop Implementing Ordinance ➢ Hold 1st Reading of Ordinance ➢ Hold 2nd Reading of Ordinance ➢ Fees could go into effect 90 days after public notice of 1st reading ➢ Update Comprehensive Plan after adoption ➢ Develop Administrative Procedures 4ff�a Next Steps v.* If elect to request reduction of County Impact Fee: ➢ Finish Study ➢ Hold a workshop or hearing on results ➢ Provide direction based on data in the Study ➢ Submit formal request to County for consideration ➢ Meet with County to discus request ➢ Receive response from the County ➢ Discuss response and outline next steps 22 10/24/2023 Rit ~' Xx For Discussion : ft:0* Commission Consensus regarding: 1. Update of the Complete Streets Mobility Plan 2. Update of Mobility Fee Technical Report 3. Mobility Fee Option Selection y�rt t 5 mo, 4*- ist6 71 � attn, ell �y F 111•• ., 5.4 ■MOAP •0 MOBILITY FEE Jonathan B. Paul, AICP Amanda Radigan, AICP a �YLL u NUE URBAN CONCEPTS LAND USE •MOBILITY• PARKING • FEES o� Bo� 23